000			02861cam a2200337 i 4500
005			20240229160851.0
008			170217s2017 us a b 001 0 eng
020			_a9780231178747
040			_erda
043			_aa-ye---
082	0		_a349.533 _bB R I
100	1		_aMessick, Brinkley, _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aSharīa scripts : _bA historical anthropology / _cBrinkley Messick.
250			_afirst edition.
264	3	1	_aNew York : _bColumbia University Press, _c2017.
300			_avii, 519 pages.
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_aunmediated _bn _2rdamedia
338			_avolume _bnc _2rdacarrier
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 481-498) and index.
505	0		_aBooks -- Pretext : five sciences -- Commentaries: "write it down" -- Opinions -- "Practice with writing" -- Intermission -- Judgments -- Minutes -- Moral stipulations -- Contracts.
520			_aIn the first half of Sharīʻa Scripts, Messick looks at the principal types of theoretical or doctrinal juridical texts, which are collectively referred to as the "library," while those of the second half, including the genres produced by the sharīʻa courts and by notarial writers, are termed the "archive." Messick demonstrates the analytic significance of sustained attention to the textual form of written sources such as the doctrinal works, juridical opinions, court records and legal instruments studied here. He suggests that attention to form should be a precondition for wider research, for properly assessing the import of conventional source content, for the writing of history. Messick looks at historical sharīʻa through a particular instance, that of highland Yemen in the first half of the twentieth century. Yemen, of course, is an integral region of the Arabic-speaking heartlands of Islam, and the Zaydī school of jurisprudence that is the specific focus of the book has been rooted there for a millennium. Elsewhere in the same period, colonial regimes and nationalist reformers had begun to alter the political, societal and epistemic existence of the sharīʻa. They acted to replace its criminal, commercial and real estate provisions with western law, and effectively narrowed its sphere of relevance to matters of personal status and family law. In contrast, under the twentieth-century Zaydī imams the sharīʻa remained uncodified; highland sharīʻa courts maintained their historically broad competence; madrassa-trained judges employed classical sharīʻa rules of procedure and evidence; and archives had yet to upended by western-style standards of file-keeping and printed forms.
650	1	4	_aJustice
650	1	4	_aLaw reform
650	1	4	_aIslamic law
650	1	4	_aZaydīyah
650	1	4	_aLegal documents (Islamic law)
650	1	4	_aLegal documents
650	1	4	_aSocial Sciences
942			_2ddc _cBK
999			_c3163 _d3163